Tweets for 2009-03-02

  • Don’t get me wrong: I’m gratified that hair was not actually an ear hair. But, the unanswered remains. How did that monster get there, then? #
  • @ursonate I’ve use the bread machine to kneed and rise the dough, but then to put it in a dish in the oven. Both worlds. in reply to ursonate #
  • Kneading and tossing pizza dough is fun. It’s been a long time since I’ve made my own pizza, but it’s often better than even pizza places. #
  • The Wasserman interview is up finally: http://strieber.streamguys.net/022809.mp3 #
  • Whoa. I read that and wondered why the online TV website was having a civil war. @bbcnews The UN says Hutu rebels retake positions … #
  • @tonydk12 I’ve been debating about using a neti pot, myself. Sauna sounds pretty good to me. But, I waver on whether either would “help” too in reply to tonydk12 #
  • RT @uncrate http://thatswh.at collects all the Tweets which result in a “That’s what she said” reply. #
  • @ursonate another website using tweets RT @johnbattelle Skittles homepage is a Twitter search http://skittles.com/ in reply to ursonate #
  • @davegray Did you hear the one about doodling increasing recall? http://tinyurl.com/bzpjyz #
  • Oh, my poor head feels like it’s in a vice. #
  • @davegray seems like search term volume, so is makes sense to me that people using google wouldn’t search for the term google as much … in reply to davegray #
  • The #motherofallgraphs reminds me: user trend to relying on search instead of remembering domains http://tinyurl.com/cr5vpu #
  • @tonydk12 Yeah, I hear ya. I caved and did a 3am neti pot, which helped a little bit; but, I was desperate. in reply to tonydk12 #
  • @davegray Now, that one does blow my mind. Wow. in reply to davegray #
  • Good new, bad new of flu: could only sleep in 2 hour blocks; but, man, those were some really wild dreams! #
  • @davegray And, honestly, it also just seem wild that people are searching for the term “google” ON google as often as for “sex” … in reply to davegray #
  • @davegray I think adwords offers a way to check for term clusters. it would be interesting to look at each’s other commonly associated terms in reply to davegray #
  • @davegray Although, I might have to wash the burning out my eyes after looking at correlated terms to “sex” … but, ‘google’ & ‘facebook’? in reply to davegray #
  • @davegray Ah, yeah. Just saw this after I linked to a similar thought. in reply to davegray #
  • Okay, time to get ready for puncturing! #